Mittwoch, Juli 25, 2007




Student executed today
for being a gang-member!

Meysam Lotfi (Meisam Lotfi), a student who was jailed for one year during the student uprising in 1999 was executed today for being a gang-member!!

The Iranian regime has been arresting students, journalists, ethnic, and political activist and sentencing them to death. The recent killings of twelve men falsely accused for offences such as rape and kidnapping are just examples of the regime’s latest crimes against humanity.


Montag, Juli 23, 2007

Say NO to A Mockery of Human Rights by NIAC

Mission for Establishment of Human Rights

(MEHR)




Say NO to A Mockery of Human Rights by NIAC

26 July 2007, Washington, D.C.

Please read the views expressed in the following link about the participation of Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch in a round table discussion formed by a group that lobby for the unconditional relations between the US and the Islamic Regime:

http://mehr.org/NIAC_persian.mht

If you agree with these views, please sign a petition at:

http://mehr.org/NIAC_AI_HRW.htm

The following letters will be sent to AI and HRW on your behalf:

http://mehr.org/Public_Letter_Amnesty.mht

http://mehr.org/Public_Letter_HRW.mht

____________________________________

به میز گرد مضحکه ای که بنام حقوق بشر در ایران ترتیب داده شده و توسط سازمان های عفو بین الملل و دیدبان حقوق بشر ارتقا داده میشود اعتراض کنید.


لطفا نقطه نظرات ارائه شده در اتصالات زیر را در مورد شرکت سازمانهای عفو بین الملل و دیدبان حقوق بشر در میز گردی که یکی از لابی گران رژیم اسلامی. نیاک، تدارک دیده است بخوانید:


http://mehr.org/NIAC_persian.mht


اگر با این نظرات موافق بودید، لطفا پتیشنی را که در این مورد تهیه شده دراتصال زیر امضا کنید


http://mehr.org/NIAC_AI_HRW.htm


بعد از امضای پتیشن، نامه های زیر از جانب شما به این دو سازمان فرستاده خواهد شد.

http://mehr.org/Public_Letter_Amnesty.mht

http://mehr.org/Public_Letter_HRW.mht

MEHR

P.O. Box 2037
P.V.P., CA90274

Tel: (310) 377- 4590
Fax: (310)377- 3103

URL: http://mehr.org

Freitag, Juli 20, 2007

Arash Sahami won the television documentary award at the Amnesty International Media .


City boy

No to War. No to Mullahs.




Iranian
Human Rights film

wins

Amnesty International award


The undercover documentary Execution of a teenage girl produced by Arash Sahami (left in the picture) won the television documentary award at the Amnesty International Media .

Arash Sahami and his team risked their lives by going undercover in Iran to capture the story of this little girl and the tragic end to her life..


Newspaper article in Farsi about Atefah's execution
The Observer (July, 2006) described the documentary as:


An almost impossible to watch documentary about the life of Atefeh Sahaaleh. a 16-year-old girl
who was hanged in a public square in Iran in 2004 after being charged with ‘crimes against chastity’. Using eyewitness accounts, reconstructions and undercover footage, the programme slowly recreates Atefeh’s life and shows why the same life was brutally extinguished. At times you really just want to look away from the screen unable to believe this is happening - but don’t, because this truly is one of the best documentaries of the year and one of the most important

Dienstag, Juli 17, 2007

Save Moslah Zamani from death by execution!

Save
Moslah Zamani
from death by execution!


A 17 year old teenager, Moslah Zamani, has been sentenced to death by execution after serving 4 years imprisonment.

The judge, Brojerdi and his adviser Seyed Hassan Jafari of the Appeal Court #27 of the Supreme Court of Iran, approved the death sentence, and have instructed the authorities in the city of Sanandaj to execute the verdict.

Moslah Zamani was charged for having had sexual relationship with his girlfriend. Having served 4 years imprisonment, Moslah Zamani has been sentenced to death according to Article 105 of the Islamic criminal law.

Save Moslah Zamani from death by execution!

Association in Defence of
Political Prisoners and Human Rights in Iran

http://www.anjomane.blogfa.com
ad.hoqoqbashar@gmail.com
Tel:0044 07930193378

Montag, Juli 16, 2007

Sara Dehkordi / Schohreh Baddii: Offener Brief

Sara Dehkordi / Schohreh Baddii:

Offener Brief



Haftentlassung von
Kazem Darabi und Abas Rayel
im Fall Mykonos

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,

im Namen der Freiheit und Gerechtigkeit appellieren wir an Sie, uns Angehörige der Opfer des Mykonos-Attentats zu unterstützen.
In Zeiten der angeblich strikten Terrorismusbekämpfung seitens der deutschen Regierung und der Diskussion um die erfolgreiche Integration von Migranten, fühlen wir uns als deutsche Staatsbürger, seitens der Justiz, aber vor allem seitens der Bundesregierung, paradoxen Entscheidungen ausgesetzt.

Hintergründe:

Am 17. September 1992 tötet ein Killerkommando im Auftrag der iranischen Machthaber vier iranische Oppositionelle im Berliner Restaurant Mykonos.
Seit der Inhaftierung der Mykonos-Attentäter Kazem Darabis und Abas Rayels und insbesondere seit dem Mykonos-Urteil vom 10.April 1997, unternahm die iranische Regierung zahlreiche Versuche, Kazem Darabi durch politischen Druck auszutauschen.
Angebote aus Teheran diesbezüglich waren die Aufklärung des Todes / Aufenthaltes des israelischen Flugzeugpiloten Ron Arad, die Freilassung Helmut Hofers, der wegen „unsittlicher Beziehung zu einer Iranerin“ zwischen September 1997 (nur fünf Monate nach dem Mykonos-Urteil) und Dezember 1999 in Teheran im Evin-Gefängnis inhaftiert war und ursprünglich zum Tode durch Steinigung verurteilt wurde (siehe Details unter http://www.tagesspiegel.de/politik/;art771,2137533) und kürzlich die Freilassung Donald Kleins, der in Teheran eine 18-monatige Haftstrafe verbüßen musste, weil er auf einem Angeltrip von Dubai aus, iranische Gewässer befahren hatte. Im Le Figaro-Online vom 27.06.2007 ist folgende Aussage Kleins abgedruckt:

„Diese Sache scheint übrigens nichts mit der gegnerischen nuklearen Meinungsverschiedenheit zwischen Iran und Europa zu tun zu haben, obwohl man dies so lange vermutete. Laut Donald Klein handelte es sich vielmehr um einen Kuhhandel.

Kürzlich in der deutschen Presse über seine Befreiung interviewt, verwies der deutsche Tourist auf den iranischen Willen, ihn gegen Kazem Darabi auszutauschen, Mörder von vier iranischen Oppositionellen, getötet 1992 auf Anordnung des iranischen Geheimdienstes in einem Berliner Restaurant und in Deutschland zu lebenslanger Haftstrafe verurteilt.“
(freie Übersetzung, Quelle: http://www.lefigaro.fr/international/20070627.WWW000000521_stephane_lherbier_le_vrai_recit_de_sa_detention_iranienne.html)

Über weitere Austauschsangebote und Aufforderungen zur Freilassung Darabis von Seiten der Regierung im Iran wurde in der Presse nichts berichtet, was jedoch nicht bedeutet, dass es keine weiteren gab.




Rechtliche Fakten zur Freilassung der Mykonos-Attentäter:

Im Strafgesetzbuch ist verankert, dass Menschen ausländischer Staatsbürgerschaft, die in deutschen Gefängnissen inhaftiert sind, nach zwei Drittel ihrer Haftstrafe in ihr Heimatland abgeschoben werden können, um dort den Rest der Haftstrafe zu verbüßen.
In diesem speziellen Fall war jedoch das Herkunftsland Iran, der Auftraggeber der Morde.
An diesem Punkt sind folgende Auszüge aus dem Mykonos-Urteil und aus der Aussage des ehemaligen Staatspräsidenten Banisadr, von hoher Bedeutung:



Auszug aus dem Mykonos-Urteil vom 10.04.1997:

„Kazem Darabi Kazerounis Schuld wiegt besonders schwer. Er hat…….an der Vernichtung von vier Menschenleben mitgewirkt. Durch die Tat hat er sich als willfähriger Diener der im Iran herrschenden Machthaber erwiesen. Dem Senat ist nicht bekannt, dass er vor der Tat auch nur einen Anflug von Skrupeln gezeigt hat, was ein milderes Licht auf seine Persönlichkeit hätte werfen können.“ (Mykonos-Urteil Seite 385, Punkt 4)



Weiterhin heißt es im Urteil:

„Dagegen ist durch das Ergebnis der Beweiserhebung offenbar geworden, dass iranische Machthaber terroristische Anschläge im Ausland nicht nur billigen und ihren Tätern unverständlicherweise Ehrungen zukommen lassen, sondern dass sie selbst solche Anschläge gegen Menschen ins Werk setzen, die ihnen allein wegen der politischen Einstellung missliebig geworden sind. Ihre politischen Gegner lassen sie um der reinen Machterhaltung willen liquidieren.“ (Mykonos-Urteil Seite 361, Punkt 3)


Aussage des ehemaligen Staatspräsidenten Abol-hassan Banisadr am 23.08.1996 im Mykonos-Prozess:

„Ich habe eine Liste von 13 Personen, die in den weltbekannten, berühmten Terroranschlägen beteiligt waren….Diese Personen haben alle im iranischen Regierungssystem hohe Posten bekommen. Zum Beispiel wurde Kourosh Fouladi, der in England zu 12 Jahren Haft verurteilt worden war, nach seiner Freilassung Abgeordneter im Parlament. Weiterhin wurde Mehrdad Kokabi, der wegen Brandstiftung an einem Buchladen in England verurteilt worden war, Berater im Bildungsministerium.“



Fazit:

Rechtlich ist die Abschiebung nicht anfechtbar, da Angehörige der Opfer bzw. Nebenkläger keine Rechtsposition diesbezüglich haben.
Wichtig ist die politische Anfechtbarkeit: Das Gesetz, dass Ausländer nach zwei Dritteln der Haft abgeschoben werden können, wurde ursprünglich zur Entlastung deutscher Gefängnisse verabschiedet. Nicht jedoch, wenn ein Täter im Auftrag derjenigen Regierung gehandelt hat, zu der er abgeschoben werden soll.



Emotionales:

Nicht nur für die Angehörigen der Opfer, sondern für alle freiheitsliebenden Iraner, ist diese, vom deutschen Justiz-und Innenministerium geschickt eingefädelte Abschiebung ein Schlag ins Gesicht. Es geht nicht darum, dass die Täter ihr gesamtes Leben im Gefängnis verbringen sollen, denn dieser Protest hat nichts mit Rache zu tun. Für uns bedeutet diese Form der Freilassung, denn um nichts anderes handelt es sich in diesem Fall, eine Beugung seitens Deutschlands vor dem iranischen Staatsterrorismus. Wir kritisieren zudem die Doppelmoral seitens der Bundesregierung und der Justiz, da sicherlich eine Abschiebung der Attentäter nach nur zwei Dritteln Haft nicht zustande gekommen wäre, wären die Opfer des Attentats deutscher Herkunft gewesen.
Das Ergebnis ist ein großes Ohnmachtgefühl gegenüber beiden Seiten: der tyrannischen Regierung im Iran und der deutschen Regierung, die angeblich seit Jahren dem internationalen Terrorismus den Kampf angesagt hat (bedenke Innenminister Schäubles Sicherheitskonzept), wenn es um politische Interessen geht, jedoch nicht standhält.

Wir rufen alle Menschen, die im Namen der Menschenrechte ein Zeichen setzen und ihre Solidarität äußern möchten auf, diesen offenen Brief zu unterzeichen, ganz gleich welcher Herkunft oder mit welchem politisch-gesellschaftlichen Hintergrund.

Sara Dehkordi / Schohreh Baddii
16.07.2007

Sonntag, Juli 01, 2007

ABF: at least 50 executions only in May 2007

ABF: 50 executions only in May 2007

In light of the recent upsurge in violence in Iran, the new wave of persecution of minorities, the record high number of executions (at least 50 executions only in May 2007) including that of juvenile offenders, and the arbitrary arrests of academics, students, and peaceful human rights activists, ABF would like to draw attention to the Islamic Republic’s fundamentally flawed legal system, which, over nearly three decades, has deprived Iranians of their basic rights including the right to due process of law and which considers some categories of citizens such as the Baha’is unfit to be protected by law.

Twenty-four years ago in June 1983, seventeen members of the Baha’i community in Iran were executed in the southern city of Shiraz*. These men and women were among scores of Baha’is arrested in Shiraz in 1982-1983, interrogated repeatedly, tortured and pressured to recant their faith.

The religious judge and head of the Shiraz Revolutionary Tribunal, who sentenced these men and women to death, publicly vilified Baha’is and described them as “deviant” and as “instruments of Satan”. The judge referred to active members of the community as kofar harbi, or infidels, who have no rights, not even the right to life. “It is clear”, he said, “that there is no room, whatsoever, for Baha’ism and Baha’is in the Islamic Republic of Iran”.

Today, Baha’ism remains unrecognized in Iran, the Baha’i community has no legal status, and discrimination against it continues unchecked. Further, recent reports** indicate a new surge in anti-Baha’i propaganda and in the persecution of Baha’is dwelling in the Islamic Republic of Iran.

By remembering and honoring the memory of these seventeen victims, whose execution was a blatant violation of their right to freedom of religion, and, in the light of the alarming news from Iran, ABF hopes to draw attention to the vulnerability of the members of an unrecognized community whose blood can be shed legally in their own country.

* Bahram Afnan , Inayatu'llah Ishraqi , Kurush Haqbin, Nusrat Ghufrani Yalda'i, Roya Ishraqi , Tahereh Arjumandi Siyavushi , Bahram Yalda'i , Izzat Janami Ishraqi , Mahshid Nirumand , Shahin (Shirin) Dalvand , Zarin Muqimi-Abyanih, Hidayatu'llah Siyavushi, Mona Mahmudnizhad ,Tuba Za'irpur, Rahmatu'llah Vafa'i, Simin Sabiri , Akhtar Thabit, Abdu'l-Husayn Azadi, Jamshid Siyavushi,Suhayl Hushmand,
The information in these victims' stories is not complete. ABF hopes that by presenting what is available at this time, survivors and those who knew the victims will be encouraged to come forth and submit facts and documents relevant to their cases and to the case of other Baha'is put to death in Iran. (http://www.abfiran.org/memorial-add.php)

** Background on the recent persecution of Baha’is:

http://www.bahai.org/persecution/iran/update

Iran Steps Up Monitoring of Baha'is:
http://www.abfiran.org/english/document-269-611.php


Baha'i Schoolchildren in Iran Increasingly Harassed and Abused by School Authorities:

http://www.abfiran.org/english/document-281-656.php

A Faith Denied:
http://www.iranhrdc.org/english/pdfs/Reports/bahai_fullreport.pdf



واشنگتن، 30 ژون 2007

در پرتو افزایش اخیر خشونت در ایران، موج تازه آزار اقلیتها، شمار کم نظیر اعدامها (بیش از ۵۰ مورد تنها در ماه می سال جاری) که دربرگیرنده مجرمان نوجوان می‌شود، و دستگیری خودسرانه دانشگاهیان و دانشجویان و فعالان حقوق مدنی و اجتماعی که برای نیل به اهدافشان به شکل مسالمت‌آمیزاقدام می کنند، بنیاد برومند بر آن است که توجه همگان را به نظام قضایی اساساً معیوب جمهوری اسلامی جلب کند. نظامی که قریب سه دهه حقوق ایرانیان را، از ازجمله حق بهره‌مندی از آئین دادرسی عادلانه هماهنگ با ضوابط بین المللی، نقض کرده است و برخی اقشار شهروندان همانند بهائیان را حتی ازحق حمایت قانون نیز محروم می کند.

۲۴ سال پیش در خردادماه سال ۱۳۶۲، هفده عضو محفل بهائیان ایران در شهر جنوبی شیراز اعدام شدند. این زنان و مردان از میان انبوه بهائیانی بودند که در سالهای ۱۳۶۱ و ۱۳۶۲ در شیراز* دستگیر شده، مورد بازجویی‌های مکرر قرار گرفته، شکنجه شده، و تحت فشار قرار گرفته بودند تا دین خود را تکذیب کنند.

حاکم شرع و رئیس دادگاه انقلاب شیراز که آنان را به مرگ محکوم کرد، علناً از بهائیان به عنوان "منحرف" و "ابزار شیطان" یاد نمود. حاکم شرع اعضای فعال محفل بهائیان را "کفار حربی" خواند که هیچ حقی ندارند حتی حق حیات. او گفت: "واضح است که تحت هیچ شرایطی جایی برای بهائیگری و بهائیان در جمهوری اسلامی ایران وجود ندارد."

تا به امروز دین بهائی در ایران به رسمیت شناخته نشده است و محفل بهائیان هیچ جایگاه قانونی ندارد و تبعیض علیه آن بی‌محابا ادامه دارد. علاوه براین، گزارشات اخیر** نشانگر آن است که تبلیغات ضد بهائی و آزار بهائیان در جمهوری اسلامی ایران افزایش یافته است.

با یادآوری و گرامیداشت خاطره این ۱۷ قربانی که اعدامشان مصداقی است خشونت بار از نقض حق آزادی وجدان و مذهب‌ ، و در پرتو اخبار نگران کننده از ایران، بنیاد برومند امیدوار است تا توجه همگان را به آسیب پذیری اعضای قشری ازجامعه که موجودیتش به رسمیت شناخته نمی شود جلب کند؛ این افراد در کشوری زندگی می کنند که قانون ریختن خونشان را مجاز نموده.

...................

*اطلاعات مربوط به این قربانیان کامل نیست. بنیاد برومند امیدوار است که با ارائه آنچه که در این مقطع در دسترس می‌باشد، بازماندگان و تمامی کسانی که این قربانیان را می‌شناسند تشویق شده و با مراجعه به (http://www.abfiran.org/farsi/memorial-add.php) مدارک و شواهد مربوط به این پرونده‌ها و پرونده‌های مربوط به سایر بهائیانی که در ایران اعدام شده‌اند را ارائه کنند. نامها : سهیل هوشمند، طوبی زائرپور، جمشید سیاوشی ، عبدالحسین آزادی، عزت جانمی اشراقی، رویا اشراقی، عنایت الله اشراقی، بهرام افنان، طاهره ارجمندی سیاوشی، هدایت الله سیاوشی کورش حق بین، شهین (شیرین) دالوند ، اختر ثابت، مونا محمودنژاد، سیمین صابری، رحمت الله وفائی، مهشید نیرومند، بهرام یلدایی، نصرت غفرانی یلدائی

**در زمینه آزار اخیر بهائیان:

http://www.bahai.org/persian/persecution/iran/update

Mittwoch, Juni 20, 2007

A Man and a Woman Schedule to be Stoned on Thursday, June 21

A Man and a Woman Schedule to be Stoned
on Thursday, June 21


The news about the scheduled stoning of a man and a woman in Takistan, Ghazvin, was spread through mobile phone messages and the Internet. The office of Showraye Tameen of Ghazvin province has issued the order to stone and man and a woman in public.

The judge of Branch 1 of the Criminal Court of Takistan will be present in person to throw the first stone. This was scheduled to be done on Sunday, June 17, but the Office of Showraye Tameen of Ghazvin province postponed it to Thursday, June 21.

Mokarrameh Ebrahimi is a 43 year old woman and mother of an 11 year old who has spent the past 11 years in Choubin prison in Ghazvin after being sentenced to stoning. The father of the child has also been in prison for 11 years and is scheduled to be stoned with her.

According to the Meydaan, the official site of the Stop Stoning Forever Campaign, an informed source has verified the news and added that “the pits are dug and prepared in Behesht Zahra cemetery to implement the sentence.”

This source also added that the sentence has been issued solely based on the judge’s knowledge, and there have been no witnesses to the so called crime of adultery and having a child out of wedlock. It seems that the couple have lived together for a while and shortly after been imprisoned. There are different rumors about the woman’s past. Some say that her husband had thrown her out of the house and she had been living with her mother for two years. Both the man and the woman have children from their previous marriages. Mokarrameh, who is the mother of three children, is very distressed and in sever disarray in prison.

It seems that after the appeal to the Judicial Commission for Amnesty and Clemency had been rejected, it is going to be carried out as the result of the perseverance of one of the judiciary officials in Ghazvin.


The official announcement about the stoning is going to be posted at the site of execution in order to invite the public to participate in the process in Takistan. This is while the Iranian officials continue to deny any stoning sentence.

The Stop Stoning Forever Campaign activists plea to the citizens of the world to take any actions they possibly can in order to stop the stoning of this couple from taking place.

Further detailed information will be provided as campaign activists are trying to obtain more knowledge about the case in Takistan.

To contact campaign activists in the US or Iran please email Soheila Vahdati
or Shadi Sadr .

By: Stop Stoning Forever Campaign

Iranian Opposition in Paris

Iran Press Service (logo)




Iranian

Opposition

in Paris

By Safa Haeri

Paris, 15 June (IPS-NewsMax) A broad cross-section of Iranian political activists and organizations are holding a new meeting in Paris to create a "coordinating council" aimed at changing the present ruling theocratic system in Iran and help installing a democratic government in their country.

They are calling their movement "Iran Solidarity". "Iran Solidarity aims to bring together activists and organizations from across the political spectrum to build a bridge between groups working outside Iran and those working inside", Dr. Hossein Baqerzadeh, a human rights activist told NewsMax from London.

“What we want to this at this stage is to evaluate our potentials for continuing the struggle, set up two coordinating committees, one for Europe and another one for the United States to bring together all Iranians opposed to this regime and eventually, forming an Iranian government in exile”, one of the organizers told Iran Press Service.

"That is what Iran Solidarity is all about", one of the organizers said. "It's a new spirit of cooperation".

Organizers in Holland, Britain, France, Germany, and the United States who spoke to NewsMax on background, say they expect more than two hundred delegates to the invitation-only conference, which will be held from June 15-17.

Among the participants are well-known leftist activists, such as Kambiz Rousta and Dr. Hassan Massali, who opposed the former Shah and for years have been vilified by the monarchist camp.

Sitting next to them will be conservative former monarchists such as Mr. Shahriar Ahi, an advisor to Prince Reza Pahlavi, University Professor Dr. Shahin Fatemi, or Dr. Cyrus Amouzegar, a former government minister under the shah. Also at the table will be Mohsen Sazegara, a confidant of Ayatollah Rouhollah Khomeini who helped to found the dreaded Revolutionary Guards but who broke with the regime in the late 1980s and was jailed repeatedly and tortured because of his calls for change and Ali Afshari, a former students leader.

"Some groups can't accept the new political realities that require reaching across party lines, and have said they will not come", said Baqerzadeh. "But we are not closing the door", he added.

It took nearly two years of intense and often frustrating political work before Baqerzadeh and other conference organizers got to this point.

During two earlier meetings in Berlin and London, they hammered out a common platform acceptable to Iranian opposition groups that range from supporters of the monarchy to Marxists and to former members of the Islamic regime.

"We're saying to everybody who wants to come, “Check your politics at the door”, one of the organizers told NewsMax. "Keep your political identity and your political philosophy, but stand together as we support the social and professional movements inside Iran. Stand together before world public opinion".

However, some of the participants are skeptic: “Belief in factors like democracy, political and individual freedom in a country with huge and complicated problems like Iran is not enough. The present Iranian society, the young and women who makes 70 per cent of Iran’s population have a different interpretation for freedom, especially the freedom of the individual”, observed Ahmad Ra’fat, a journalist who often talks to Iranian students and women activists in Iran observed.

What Iranians outside are fighting for is quite different from what Iranians inside the country wants.

“The problem with these meetings, conferences, alliances or coalitions is their unilateralism. The participants are gathered around opposition or anti-ism, leaving discussions and debates about the future and how solving problems in a complex and complicated country like Iran to the future”, he said in his article, referring to the Paris meeting.

“While here, the emphasis is still on the form of the regime, inside Iran, the focus of the opponents is the content. The students and youngsters want basic human freedoms; women want equality of rights, political as well as social. They say they don’t care about the name of the regime or whether the rulers are clerics or not, provided we get our rights”, he added, talking to IPS.

It is not the first time that Iranian opposition groups have come together across party lines, but without tangible and concert results. Eearlier attempts to create a broad-based coalition, dating back to 1997, all failed when one party tried to dominate the others.

In a discreet nod in the direction of the conference organizers, Reza Pahlavi, son of the former Shah, who is expected to address the Paris meeting, appealed to European nations support the struggle for human rights and political freedom in Iran.

Addressing the Democracy and Security International Conference that was held in Prague on 5 and 6 June 2007 and at which appeared President George Bush, Mr. Pahlavi appealed to all democratic governments of the world, especially to the Europeans for solidarity with the people of Iran against a common enemy: Islamist preachers of intolerance who turn young men and women into walking bombs, shouting death to America, death to Israel, death to whosoever resists their murderous ideology.

“To the realpolitik cynics who say Islamist theocracy is a reality we have to live with, I respond: funny – they never said they can live with YOU! To those who say the theocrats can reform if we are nice to them, I say you do not know the difference between Islamist revolution and secular ones. Those who believe they speak with the absolute authority of Allah demand absolute submission”.

http://www.iran-press-service.com/ips/articles-2007/june-2007/iran_opposition_18607.shtml


Montag, Juni 18, 2007

Sat 23rd June, 8pm
Artsdepot Studio
Tally Ho Corner,
No.5,Nether Street, North Finchley London N12 0GA
Junction of:
Ballards Lane, North Finchley, A1000,
Box Office 020 8369 5454
www.artsdepot.co.uk
_Show-23june.gif
شنبه 23 ژوئن - ساعت 8 - لندن

اطلاعات و رزرو
Booking 020 8202 9835 - 07 888 75

Donnerstag, Juni 14, 2007

To

His Honor Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg

P.O.BOX 8001
Dep. N – 0030 OSLO
E-mail: postmottak@smk.dep. no


Copy to:
His Excellency Ban Ki Moon the, Secretary General of The United Nations.
International Criminal Court Re: OTP – CR- 118/04
European Court of Human Rights Re: 24855/03
Secretary General of the European Council
Amnesty International
Human Rights Watch
Local and International Medias



Your Honor:
More than a month is gone and yet I received no reply to my letter of April 30, 2007.
I am not sure about your decision concerning I want my life back that is taken away from me because: I refused to betray my country and my compatriots and for I refused to violate laws and become a cause of bloodshed. And also damages of Europars A/S must be compensated because, for the same reasons, I was not allowed to run the company neither in Norway nor abroad. Worst than that threaten was made, early in this year, by “register of Business Enterprises” that it will close the company!
Subsequent to failure of the exertion all kind of systematic pressure for compelling me “comply with” the above orders, it looks like the state of Norway has finally put me, practically, in the starvation condition out to death. Or else, “If someone is so capable that can in less than 14 minutes read the matter of 30 pages, makes “fair”! decision, and answers, why anyone in this country within the length of 16 years “cannot answer” to an easy question as “Do I have right to live or do not I?”’ I wrote in the subject letter.
And now after more than a month I received no answer to my question, “Please let me know what you want to do with me? Return it [my personal life and the Europars damages] back to me, or starve me out to death?”
A young pretty girl was found dead in her room right next to my sell, when the addicts where keeping in this location. I did not even know that she was living here until her death. I also saw two other gung person (a man and a woman) were fall on the street in distance of about 400 miter apart from each other were breathing their last. The man was only fifty meters away from where I am kept, but what could I do?
I embarrassed mentioning of that I used to feed another young man who was living up over my sell. But that is truth. And the truth is that now I, myself, am put in grave danger of starvation.
Based on the experiences of these realities and more similar facts, which I have seen with my own eyes, Should I, as a human right activist, declare that subsequent to failure of compelling me “comply with the conditions” the state of Norway has not only closed the doors of any activities on me, but it has seriously put me in the danger of starvation condition out to death?
I am kept deprived of life under severe pressures for past sixteen and a half year because of the aforementioned reasons but nothing could change me and nothing can, because I do not want it. I believe that so much pressure on me have root to the hatred towards the peace and freedom loving of Iranian’s attitude. Otherwise I have not done any wrongdoing. But I am only one person out of seventy million of Iranian people who is very proud of being one and elimination of me, I promise, would absolutely change nothing regarding my country. There are millions of us who believe in same thing and act the same.
Therefore I would like to take this opportunity and request the United Nations’ Security Council for please terminate insertion of pressure on Iran and the Iranian people. There exist no such thing as “intelligent sanction” whatsoever, at least respect to Iran. Nor anyone can decide for we the nation of Iran how to die! Nor the officials, at the present situations, in Iran are allowed to comply with the unlawful and illegitimate demands. In case, they must resign first or they know better than anyone else that they would go immediately.
Now back to you, Mr. Prime minister, please let me know what you want to do with me? I, however, could as difficult as possible, keep myself alive for the past month, but I cannot let myself continue it that way any more without: food, medicine, medical care, and other living necessities in the most expensive city in the world without money at all.
Would you please return my life back to me and compensate the damages of the Europars Company, or murder me by starvation? What you want to proof in the latter case? How about that, it surely is I who decide how to die if I have to? Please settle with me as quickly as possible.
Looking forward for prompt action

Truly yours

Jahanguir Nadimi

P. O. Box 349
1471 LØRE
nskog, Norway
E-mail: j.nadimi@yahoo.com



Mittwoch, Mai 30, 2007

Pressedienst der „Frauen gegen Fundamentalismus“

Pressedienst der „Frauen gegen Fundamentalismus“




Frauen- Fußballspiel am 01.06.07 ab 17:00 Uhr

im Kreuzberger Katzbachstadion Berlin
I
ranische Frauen Nationalmannschaft gegen Fußball-Verein BSV AL-Dersimsport


Auch wenn die iranischen Frauen die Freiheit erhalten sollten im Ausland Fußball zu spielen, auch wenn iranische Freuen Filme in der Berlinale anbieten dürfen,
der Schein trügt!
Seit Beginn der islamischen Republik im Iran, sind Frauen gesetzlich der Rechtlosigkeit und Zwangsverschleierung ausgesetzt.

Es existiert das patriarchale System der Unterdrückung. Jegliche Widerstand der StudentenInnen-, ArbeiterInnen- und LehrerInnenbewegung, wird im Keim erstickt.

Zwangsverschleierung ist nur eines dieser Unterdrückungsmechanismen. Die Verfassung des Staates minimiert jegliche Rechte der Frauen, sei es in der Ehe, in der Arbeitswelt, in der Freizeit und sonst in der gesamten Lebensplanung. Es ist in der iranischen Verfassung verankert, dass die Frau halb so viel Wert ist, wie der Mann (Gesetz gegen Vergeltung, Artikel 6).

Mit Hilfe des Islams werden gesellschaftlich Rollenbilder gefestigt, die das System der Unterdrückung immer wieder reproduzieren. Sämtliche Randgruppen unterliegen den staatlichen Repressionen, z. B. Hinrichtungen der Homosexuellen, Steinigung bei Ehebruch etc.

Nach Außen schien es eine Zeitlang, dass sich die Situation der Frauen im Iran verbessert. Seit 20.04.07 wurde diese Entwicklung ein jähes Ende gesetzt. Urteile wurden gegen Feministinnen ausgesprochen. Frauen die BAD HEDJAB, schlecht verschleiert das Haus verließen wurden wieder gejagt und festgenommen.

Wir freuen uns sehr die iranischen Fußballerinnen in Berlin begrüßen zu dürfen und sagen dennoch:

Schluss mit der Zwangsverschleierung im Iran!
Schluss mit den Repressionen gegen Frauen im Iran!
Schluss mit der Steinigung und Hinrichtungen im Iran!
Schluss mit dem Kampf gegen jegliche oppositionelle Bewegungen im Iran!

FRAUEN GEGEN FUNDAMENTALISMUS

frauengegenfundamentalismus@yahoo.de

Samstag, Mai 26, 2007

أ




Freitag, Mai 18, 2007

Engaging with a ruthless regime

Engaging with a ruthless regime

Sheema Kalbasi

The difference between some one like Haleh Esfandiari and I, Sheema Kalbasi, is that I see the Iranian regime as a group of people who have committed and continue to commit horrendous crimes against humanity. People like Dr. Esfandiari -- who I hope will return to the U.S. safe and sound especially since Keyhan has accused her of apostasy-- do support a dialogue with the Iranian regime. I like to know why Ms. Esfandiari's husband is devastated over his wife's arrest and why he doesn't try to engage in a dialogue with the Iranian regime? Why Shaul Bakhash goes on BBC to confirm that Esfandiari is still a Muslim? After all Ms. Esfandiari and people like her insist on engaging in a dialogue with the Iranian regime.

So what if she is accused of apostasy! So what if women and men are stoned to death in Iran! So what if political activists and Bahaies are arrested and executed and the Bahai graveyards are destroyed, and they are not even allowed to bury their dead in adherence to their religious tradition. So what if Kurds are murdered and their dead body are shown throughout the town to teach a lesson! So what if Iranian women have no right to their children after divorce! So what if Iranian women don't have equal opportunities, and so what if women activists, workers, and teachers are arrested! So what if intellectuals have been murdered and bloggers are arrested! So what if minors are hanged or are on death row in Iran. So what if homosexuals and bisexuals are arrested and sometimes executed. Iranian regime is a regime that one can engage in a dialogue with.

I am sure once Dr. Esfandiari is back in the U.S. she will continue to work with her boss and this time her words and work will have more legitimacy since she will be that victim of the Iranian regime her self!! For people who have lost nothing and/or their countrymen and women's arrests and executions has not influenced and effected their lives the Iranian regime is surly legitimize enough to engage in a talk with. They tend to show Ahmadinejad is the worst case Iran has ever had during the years Iran has been occupied by the regime.

Let us not forget the Iranian regime is not a product of president Ahmadinejad. The Iranian regime has been in power for almost thirty years and Ahmadinejad is the product of this regime. I may be buying a lot of junk and a lot of junk may sit on my figure but this junk regarding Ahmadinejad just doesn't fit and sit right with me!! And let us thank the Democratic presidential candidate Ms. Clinton for bringing attention to Haleh's case! I hope she will not forget the Iranian regime's problem with Dr. Esfandiari is not her duel citizenship! Comment

Visit zaneirani.blogspot.com

Dienstag, Mai 01, 2007

The Seven Valleys of Love

The Seven Valleys of Love

The Bilingual Anthology of Women Poets

from the Middle Ages Persia to the Present Time Iran

Translations and Editing by

Sheema Kalbasi


The title of this anthology of Iranian women's poetry, collected and translated into English by Iranian-born American-based poet and woman of letters Sheema Kalbasi, refers to the narrative of the medieval Persian allegory Mantegh ot-Tayr (Conference of the Birds) written by Farid od-Din Attar.

Attar, one of the seminal figures of early Persian literature, was also one of the most committed advocates of the doctrines of the incipient Islamic mystical movement, Sufism. Attar's literary concepts, such as the motif of 'the Seven Valleys of Love', had a profound effect on not only future Persian-speaking poets (most notably Rumi and Hafez); but also introduced, or at least for the first time articulated unambiguously, a number of tenets of one of the medieval world's most significant and enduring theosophical schools.

Among these notions was Eshgh (literally 'Love'), which, in a Greco-Western episteme, seems closer to agape than either philia or eros. This ideal was most vividly illustrated in Attar's abovementioned narrative verse, in which a group of thirty birds embarks on a journey to meet the majestic Si-morgh – a mythological giant bird symbolizing wisdom. Instead of finding the Si-morgh as such, however, the birds experience something ostensibly more poignant: they undergo the Sufi concept of Fana (Annihilation). At the end of the tale, as a consequence of enduring the arduous journey and traversing the Seven Valleys of Love, the birds have somewhat unwittingly effaced their selves (or egos); and have, as a result, unified to constitute an assembly of thirty birds, that is – in Persian – si (thirty) morgh (bird/s). The ordinary birds have, in other words, become the legendary Si-morgh in and of themselves.

It is of great interest and pertinence that Ms Kalbasi has named her anthology after the above mystical idiom. Many of the poets presented in this volume have experienced journeys similar to those of the parabolic birds; and it can be said that these authors, by the virtue of being women in an intransigently and institutionally patriarchal society such as Iran, have too had their egos threatened (although by no means 'annihilated'), and that they too have succeeded in not only surviving the travails and brutalities of sexism but have also found a Sufi-esque kind of love, solidarity and inspiration that has resulted in passionate and provocative poetry.

This is not to say, however, that this collection presents a 'journey of self-discovery' in a positivist, New Ageist sense; and neither can all the authors collected in The Seven Valleys of Love be classified as classic survivors. The mid 19th century poet Tahereh Ghoratolein, for example, was brutally murdered by the then Shah of Iran because she repudiated the hejab veil in public and proselytized for the banned Baha'i faith. The poem of hers included in this book, a close-formed ode or ghazal, can be seen as a poem of intense, almost agonistic, yearning for an unattainable beloved. It is by no means a generic 'feel good' love poem; but a profoundly devotional and theological exploration of melancholy or, as Keats may have it, 'the wakeful anguish of the soul.'

The lyrics of the above martyred feminist sit alongside those of other articulate and committed Iranian women poets in Ms Kalbasi's unique anthology. One of the other great strengths of Ms Kalbasi's work is her decision to present lesser-known poets in place of such well-known figures as Forugh Farrokhzad, Simin Behbahani and Parvin Etesami. This editorial decision is visionary and courageous. By bringing new and/or marginalized poets to an international readership, Ms Kalbasi has broken one of the most stifling taboos of poetry anthologies – that of presenting only the famous/classic 'public' poets – and has, as a result, opened a new front in giving voice to female artists usually denied exposure by unapologetically sexist and/or elitist culture industries in Iran as well as the Anglophone world.

Another important and immensely valuable dimension of this anthology can be found not only in the shared identity of the authors presented – their being Iranian and/or Persian-speaking women – but in the poems themselves, and in the range and diversity of periods, voices, discourses and poetic genres included in the book. The Seven Valleys of Love comprises poems from medieval Arabic/Turkish ruled Persia; as well as poems from the independent unitary Iranian kingdoms of the Safavid and Ghajar monarchs; as well as works by modernists and post-modernists of the Pahlavi Dynasty and the Islamic Republic. Included are also poems written in Persian by members of the considerable Iranian diaspora communities. Therefore Ms Kalbasi's selection cuts across not only chronological divides but also aesthetical and ideological chasms. Some of the poems here are versified, others are free-formed/prosaic; some are romantic/erotic in a broad sense, others speak to the specific socio-political contexts in which they were articulated.

My final evaluation of this exciting new anthology concerns what – at least for today's mainstream Western readers – may constitute the book's most noticeable characteristic: its representation of work by poets from Iran, that terminally demonized/dehumanized 'axis of Evil' nation that has seemingly been at war with the West since the Battle of Marathon between ancient Greeks and Persians in 490 BCE. It is my belief that by exposing the journey of Iran's women poets through 'the Seven Valleys of Love' Ms Kalbasi has depicted and emphasized the humanity and dignity of one of world's most misunderstood peoples, and has made a significant contribution to facilitating a cross-cultural dialogue in place of a nefarious 'Clash of Civilizations.'

Dr. Ali Alizadeh, PhD Deakin


An outstanding and honest voice from the Middle East, Sheema Kalbasi (born November 20, 1972, in Tehran, Iran) is a human right activist, an award winning poet, and literary translator. She is the director of Dialogue of Nations through Poetry in Translation, director of Poetry of Iranian Women Project, the poetry editor of The Muse Apprentice Guild and the co- director of the Other Voices International. She has authored two collections of poems, Echoes in Exile in English, and Sangsar (Stoning) in Persian. Kalbasi's work has appeared in numerous magazines, literary reviews, anthologies, and has been translated into several languages. She is one of the few literary figures to promote poets of Iranian heritage as well as international poets to an English speaking audience. Furthermore she has created the horizontal and vertical, a new style in poetry. Kalbasi's work is distinguished by her passionate defense of the ethnic and religious minorities' rights. She has worked for the United Nations and the Center for non Afghan Refugees in Pakistan, and in Denmark. Today she lives with her husband and daughter in the United States.